Cut-resistant gloves

Work gloves · Compare assembly gloves by handling requirements

Match the hazard to the correct marking

• For manual handling of sharp edges, the cut protection performance specified for the task matters. EN 388 includes different mechanical tests; the TDM cut rating is given as A to F.
• Puncture resistance is a separate EN-388 test. Neither this rating nor a TDM letter automatically demonstrates protection against a knife stab or a fine needle.
• Powered saws and draw-in points require their own risk assessment. Cut-resistant gloves do not make hand contact with running machinery acceptable.

Selection example

A workpiece has a sharp edge that presents a hazard during manual carrying. Once the required cut performance is established, compare suitable versions using a safe sample to check a secure fit and controlled changes of grip. If the next work step introduces a protruding point, assess this additional hazard separately; do not simply treat the cut rating letter as approval for puncture protection.

The material alone, such as a named high-performance fibre, does not establish a cut protection class. The test result and intended coverage must relate to the specific version. Where there is a risk of being drawn into machinery, gloves themselves can be dangerous; the specified working procedure is decisive.

Technical references: DGUV: Distinguishing cut protection from stab protection · uvex: Glove standards and separate tests · DGUV: Protective clothing and hand protection.